Re: WG dcoument status

[Jonathan Sadler <jonathan.sadler@tellabs.com>]

Kiretti -

A process question:

The signaling drafts currently make reference to a lot of
Internet-Drafts.  Specifically:
  draft-ietf-mpls-generalized-signaling-07.txt has 11 I-D references
  draft-ietf-mpls-generalized-rsvp-te-06.txt has 7 I-D references
  draft-ietf-mpls-generalized-cr-ldp-05 has 7 I-D references

Since these cannot be included in a final RFC, should the signaling
drafts drop the reference and incorporate the text from the refered
document?  If not, then shouldn't both the signalling and referenced
drafts be progressed at one time?

To progress the signaling drafts with normative references to something
that is still under development seems inappropriate...

Jonathan Sadler

Kireeti Kompella wrote:
> 
> Here's a status update.
> 
> The signaling drafts:
>         draft-ietf-mpls-generalized-cr-ldp-05.txt
>         draft-ietf-mpls-generalized-rsvp-te-06.txt
>         draft-ietf-mpls-generalized-signaling-07.txt
>         draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-sonet-sdh-02.txt
> have finished WG Last Call, and will be sent on to IETF Last Call.
> They are on the track for Proposed Standard.
============================================================
The information contained in this message may be privileged 
and confidential and protected from disclosure.  If the 
reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an 
employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
reproduction, dissemination or distribution of this 
communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received 
this communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.

Thank you.
Tellabs
============================================================