[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: WG dcoument status

Dimitri,

> 
> So "Why should we have "special cases" for ITU people, requirements
> or models, why aren't they proposing contributions as any other 
> IETFer does?"
> 

Para 3.2.4 of
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-fishman-2436bis-01.txt
says
"Formal communication is intended to allow the
   sharing of positions between the IETF and the ITU-T outside of actual
   documents (as described in 3.3). "

BTW The special case is not for "ITU people" but for "ITU T Study 
Group, Working Party or Rapporteur".

Leen Mak.