RE: draft-bonica-tunneltrace-02

[Shahram Davari <Shahram_Davari@pmc-sierra.com>]

Hi,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Randy Bush [mailto:randy@psg.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 1:18 PM
> To: Shahram Davari
> Cc: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: RE: draft-bonica-tunneltrace-02
> 
> 
> >> does OAM work on GRE?  IPsec?  if not, guess it's not Common, eh?
> > I was talking about a generic OAM not MPLS OAM. 
> 
> no such draft that i can find.

This was a generic question, not about any specific draft. So based on you reponses, a generic OAM falls under CCAMP. Good. 

> 
> > The problem is not that the charter text is not clear. The 
> problem is that
> > path-trace inherently does not fit into the mandate of the charter.
> 
> the folk who formed the mandate seem not to agree with your 
> position.

Their intention is irrelevant now. What is WRITTEN as the current charter should be the
base for discussion. May be they were not careful in writing the charter to express their
views, that is not the WGs fault. The current charter has been consented and any change needs WG conesensus.

-Shahram


  but
> if there is anything we can do to fix the text of the charter 
> to better
> communicate that to you, do tell us.
> 
> randy
>