RE: draft-bonica-tunneltrace-02

[Shahram Davari <Shahram_Davari@pmc-sierra.com>]

Hi,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Randy Bush [mailto:randy@psg.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 1:08 PM
> To: Shahram Davari
> Cc: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: RE: draft-bonica-tunneltrace-02
> 
> 
> >>  - Define signalling protocols and measurement protocols 
> such that they
> >>    support multiple physical path and tunnel technologies
> > 2) Does OAM, that measure availability, also fall under 
> this definition? 
> 
> does OAM work on GRE?  IPsec?  if not, guess it's not Common, eh?

I was talking about a generic OAM not MPLS OAM. 

> 
> >> - and draft-bonica-tunneltrace-01.txt to this section.
> 
> > The charter only says this is under consideration, it is 
> not saying it is
> > a WG document or should be a WG document.
> 
> as i offered previously, if you don't feel the current 
> charter text covers
> this document, then send text that you will accept that says 
> it is in the
> charter and the charter will be fixed.  not a problem.


The problem is not that the charter text is not clear. The problem is that path-trace inherently does not fit into the mandate of the charter. 


-Shahram

> 
> randy
>