Randy:
I don't think closeness to CCAMPs heart is the issue. Given the current discussion, the WG is working on the document. Only question is when it hits escape velocity. I don't think there is a suggestion of never....
rgds
Dave
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Randy Bush [mailto:randy@research.att.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 5:10 PM
> To: Cuevas, Enrique G, ALASO
> Cc: ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Ron Bonica; Loa Andersson; Allan, David
> [CAR:NS00:EXCH]
> Subject: RE: draft-bonica-tunneltrace-02
>
>
> > Why should a document be approved as a WG doc. if there are so many
> > conflicting issues?
>
> so the wg can work on the document, the question is not whether the
> document is perfect. the question is whether it is well within the
> bounds of the charter. in this case, this document seems nearer the
> center of the ccamp charter then most of the other documents i have
> seen here.
>
> randy (hatless)
>
>