[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Reply All???

At Thu, 17 Oct 2013 13:27:03 -0600,
Ken Gunderson wrote:
> 
> Hello People:
> 
> One thing I miss in Wanderlust is "Reply All".  Some command I'm
> missing here??

Hi Ken,

Doesn’t reply by default reply-all? C-u a has different behavior. See
the wl-draft-reply-without-argument-list and
wl-draft-reply-with-argument-list variables. It’s a little strange.
Here is my setup, so C-u a is reply all and a is reply to sender.

;; Invert behaviour of with and without argument replies.
;; from David Bremner
;; just the author
(setq wl-draft-reply-without-argument-list
      '(("Reply-To" ("Reply-To") nil nil) 
        ("Mail-Reply-To" ("Mail-Reply-To") nil nil) 
        ("From" ("From") nil nil)))

;; bombard the world
(setq wl-draft-reply-with-argument-list
      '(("Followup-To" nil nil ("Followup-To")) 
        ("Mail-Followup-To" ("Mail-Followup-To") nil ("Newsgroups")) 
        ("Reply-To" ("Reply-To") ("To" "Cc" "From") ("Newsgroups")) 
        ("From" ("From") ("To" "Cc") ("Newsgroups"))))

Sent from my free software system <http://fsf.org/>.