[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [v4tov6transition] Any Experience with Using Behave's Stateless NAT-PT for IMS-SIP VoIP Application...
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
When you must translate between protocols, most service providers use
sip b2bua aka an sbc.
On 9/22/10, Mosley, Leonard <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Greetings Fred et al, I had a couple of inquiries concerning use of the
> Behave WG NAT-PT algorithms:
> 1) I was wondering what vendors currently are implementing the Behave
> WG's NAT-PT algorithms?
> 2) Has anyone had any experience testing or implementing the stateless
> algorithm for use cases involving IMS SIPv4 VoIP clients calling SIPv6
> clients and vice versa. Such use cases assume an architecture where there
> is a co-existence period in the network consisting of both "legacy" SIPv4
> clients and "newer" SIPv6 (dual-stack and/or v6-only) clients.
> 3) I'm curious about RTP performance under moderate to heavy call loads
> as well as NAT-PT interaction with IMS-ALG. If anyone can share at a
> high-level that would be great.
> Len Mosley
> Time Warner Cable
> This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable
> proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to
> copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for
> the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not
> the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any
> dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the
> contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be
> unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the
> sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this
> E-mail and any printout.
Sent from my mobile device