Re: draft-nakibly-v6ops-tunnel-loops as a WG item? (was Re: Agenda for 78th IETF)

[Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>]

Over to the list. Opinions?

On Jul 3, 2010, at 12:23 PM, Gabi Nakibly wrote:

> Fred, 
> I would like to propose the adoption of the 
> draft draft-nakibly-v6ops-tunnel-loops as a WG item. The draft documents the 
> routing loop attack and mitigation measures and practices as discussed on the 
> list. I believe that the document contains some useful information for network 
> operators who wishes to securely deploy IPv6 within an IPv4 network. The 
> document falls under goal #2 of the WG charter:
> 
>     2. Publish Informational or BCP RFCs that identify potential security
>     risks in the operation of shared IPv4/IPv6 networks, and document
>     operational practices to eliminate or mitigate those risks.
> 
> I will appreciate yours and the list's feedback.
> 
> Best regards,
> Gabi
> 
> ----- Original Message ----
>> From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
>> To: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
>> Sent: Mon, June 28, 2010 9:55:41 AM
>> Subject: Agenda for 78th IETF
>> 
>> I rather expected to get requests for
>> 
>>         draft-sarikaya-v6ops-prefix-delegation-01.txt
>>         draft-nakibly-v6ops-tunnel-loops-02.txt
>>         draft-korhonen-v6ops-3gpp-eps-03.txt
>>         draft-ietf-v6ops-incremental-cgn-01.txt
>> 
>> What I have is the following.
>> 
>> Those who want agenda time should please post drafts to support it and should 
>> let me know. We were in fact given two slots in the initial agenda. If things 
>> remain as they stand, I'll cut that back to one.
>> 
>> Begin forwarded message:
>> 
>>> From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
>>> Date: June 24, 2010 5:33:31 AM PDT
>>> To: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
>>> Subject: Agenda call
>>> 
>>> Anyone who wants time, please drop me a note.
>>> 
>>> Note that the Secretariat and IESG are currently struggling with the agenda, 
>> and we may very well wind up with one slot instead of two. I want to give all 
>> the time needed for discussions we need to have, and not waste time arguing for 
>> the second slot if we won't actually use it. So I really need to know this week.
>> 
>> Begin forwarded message:
>> 
>>> From: "Gunter Van de Velde (gvandeve)" <gvandeve@cisco.com>
>>> Date: June 24, 2010 7:19:46 AM PDT
>>> To: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>, "IPv6 Operations" 
>> <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
>>> Cc: "Ole Troan" <ot@cisco.com>, <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
>>> Subject: RE: Agenda call
>>> 
>>> Ole, Tim and myself would like few minutes on the harmful tunnels work.
>>> It is to be re-submitted very soon.
>>> 
>>> G/
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Begin forwarded message:
>> 
>>> From: Rajeev Koodli <rkoodli@cisco.com>
>>> Date: June 24, 2010 5:51:55 AM PDT
>>> To: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
>>> Subject: Re: Agenda call
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ------ Forwarded Message
>>> From: Rajeev Koodli <rkoodli@cisco.com>
>>> Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2010 18:09:06 -0700
>>> To: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
>>> Conversation: Looking for v6ops agenda items
>>> Subject: Re: Looking for v6ops agenda items
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Hi Fred,
>>> 
>>> I would like 10 minutes please. Depending on the "agenda density", I could
>>> use 5 more minutes for Q&A.
>>> 
>>> draft-ietf-v6ops-v6-in-mobile-networks
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> 
>>> -Rajeev
>>> 
>> Begin forwarded message:
>> 
>>> From: "Gunter Van de Velde (gvandeve)" <gvandeve@cisco.com>
>>> Date: June 24, 2010 7:22:15 AM PDT
>>> To: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
>>> Cc: "Tony Hain (ahain)" <ahain@cisco.com>, "Chip Popoviciu (cpopovic)" 
>> <cpopovic@cisco.com>
>>> Subject: RE: Agenda call
>>> 
>>> Hi Fred,
>>> 
>>> I would like to ask 10 minutes time to discuss "IP protocol
>>> selection"... its not a draft yet, but the idea is out there and I just
>>> have to write it down... should be done rather soon once I get to it.
>>> 
>>> G/
>> Begin forwarded message:
>> 
>>> From: <Jason.Weil@cox.com>
>>> Date: June 27, 2010 11:39:30 AM PDT
>>> To: <fred@cisco.com>
>>> Cc: <marla.azinger@frontiercorp.com>, <tli@cisco.com>
>>> Subject: RE: Agenda call
>>> 
>>> Fred,
>>> 
>>> Tony Li, Marla Azinger and I would like a few minutes to discuss a CIDR for 
>> IPv6 draft which is basically an update to RFC4632. It will be submitted to the 
>> list shortly. Either Marla or I will be in attendance to present.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> 
>>> Jason
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

http://www.ipinc.net/IPv4.GIF