[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: IPv6 Operations <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Subject: draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-08
- From: james woodyatt <email@example.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:13:24 -0800
It's possible nobody noticed this back in October, because I didn't make a big deal about it, but there is a new-ish revision of this Internet Draft, which aims to address the failure to arrive at a consensus in Stockholm. I'd like to go into Anaheim with a current draft that has a good chance of passing a working group last call, so can we please begin a discussion about the latest revision. Here is a summary of the most recent changes:
A.8. draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-07 to
o Use REC- instead of R for prefixing recommendations.
o Remove second sentence of REC-41, dropping the somewhat squirrely
language about documentation standards.
o Remove section 3.2.7 Other Virtual Private Network Protocols,
o Improve section 3.4, Passive Listeners, with a reference to
[RFC5389] and further explanation of motivation for
o Correct order of recommendations in summary section.
o Update reference to [RFC5533].
It's possible there are some points the group still needs to wrangle over before consensus will emerge. Can we identify the points where solutions can be found and where they can't?
james woodyatt <firstname.lastname@example.org>
member of technical staff, communications engineering