[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: R41 in draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-07
On Jul 31, 2009, at 13:33, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
As the work is in progress, at this point the document could say
instead:"Internet Gateway Device profile of the Universal Plug And
Play protocol is being extended for IPv6."
Fair enough. I'll make that change in the -08 revision.
I agree with Barbara that second sentence of R41 is not appropriate.
What would be the possible replacement for the MUST, if that is
taken as compromise approach?
I think it should suffice to delete the second sentence from R41
entirely. It would then read as follows:
R41: Gateways SHOULD implement a protocol to permit applications to
solicit inbound traffic without advance knowledge of the addresses
exterior nodes with which they expect to communicate.
james woodyatt <email@example.com>
member of technical staff, communications engineering