[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
On Mar 5, 2009, at 6:32 PM, Dan Wing wrote:
For sure. We know the draft name rules. When we wrote the draft,
we were not sure which WG it should be submitted. It seems relevant
to both v6ops and behave.
As a BEHAVE co-chair, I haven't seen a request for agenda time for
draft-jiang-incremental-CGN-00, nor any discussion about the draft
on the BEHAVE mailing list.
It may be that Brian asked me first. He was of the opinion that this
is more operational in nature than about the specifics of the NAT
operation, and I agreed to give it some air time. We'll see what
happens to it.