[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: NAT64 support in CPE?

To: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
Subject: Re: NAT64 support in CPE?
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:33:17 -0600
Cc: v6ops Operations <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>, marcelo bagnulo <marcelo@it.uc3m.es>
In-reply-to: <D34A86EB-FF52-4F13-ACBB-9891D8C5F6E0@muada.com>
References: <D34A86EB-FF52-4F13-ACBB-9891D8C5F6E0@muada.com>


On Nov 18, 2008, at 1:53 PM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:

I looked over draft-baker-behave-v4v6-framework-00 again, but Icouldn't find any place where the CPE would perform any actions toenable NAT64 or make NAT64 work better. Did I miss something?

By the way, as I recall the outcome of the Montreal interim, thequestion isn't "nat64", it is "the outcome of behave", which is amerger of IVI and NAT64. Did you understand differently?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: NAT64 support in CPE?
  - From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>

References:
- NAT64 support in CPE?
  - From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>

Prev by Date: Re: NAT64 support in CPE?
Next by Date: Re: draft-wbeebee-ipv6-cpe-router-03
Previous by thread: Re: NAT64 support in CPE?
Next by thread: Re: NAT64 support in CPE?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread