Re: Some suggestions for draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-03

[james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com>]

On Aug 25, 2008, at 04:38, Mark Smith wrote:
> OTOH, if the draft is also covering firewalling requirements to allow
> IPv6 over IPv4, then I support what you're saying for that scenario.  
> If
> the draft is covering IPv6 over IPv4 methods and therefore the
> consequent IPv4 firewalling requirements, then I think that needs to  
> be
> made more obvious in the draft.

Point noted.  It needs to be more obvious in the draft.

> On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 09:04:40 +1200 Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com 
> > wrote:
>
> > How about referring to draft-ietf-v6ops-tunnel-security-concerns?
> > We should probably concentrate those issues in one place.
>
> I certainly agree, I haven't yet come across that draft. I'll have a
> look at it.

I plan to do that when I import the Teredo heuristic from its earlier  
[expired] draft.  A new draft should be available soon (end of the  
week?) I hope.



--
james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com>
member of technical staff, communications engineering