[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Another requirement [Re: New (-02) version of IPv6 CPE Router draft is available for review]



On Thu, 31 Jul 2008, Antonio Querubin wrote:

On Thu, 31 Jul 2008, Francois-Xavier Le Bail wrote:

Another requirement:

The CPE should install a discard (null) or unreachable route for the
delegated prefix.

This would definately be a good idea for the first CPE router that gets delegated the big block of /56 or /48 (whatever) from the ISP. But what if it's one of the cascaded routers farther downstream? Some intelligent

Never mind - too early in the morning. The choice to reply with an unreachable or just silently discard for unused subnets/addresses within delegated prefix should be a vendor option though.

Antonio Querubin
whois:  AQ7-ARIN