Re: Use of extended prefix lengths

[Chuck Anderson <cra@WPI.EDU>]

On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 02:28:20PM -0700, bill fumerola wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 07:26:00PM +0200, Mohacsi Janos wrote:
> > for point-to-point links prefix longer than /64 was worked without any 
> > problem on Cisco boxes.
> 
> for internal point-to-point links, using ospfv3 + link-local addresses
> + /128s on loopbacks has worked well for me. for point-to-point on the
> edge, i've used /64s down to /120s. depending on your IGP, using global
> addresses on point-to-point may have its benefits.

How does traceroute work when using link-local addressing on 
point-to-point links?