[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [BEHAVE] IPv6 Flow Label
On May 6, 2008, at 5:58 AM, Hesham Soliman wrote:
I think that a perfectly useful answer to the IESG is to say that
there is no _need_ for NATs in IPv6, we don't have to consider it.
The fact that IPv6 has the same routing technology as IPv4 guarantees
there will be a market for NATv6 (assuming IPv6 gets deployed), if for
no other reason than people not wanting to be tied to their ISP.
Personally, I think the appropriate behaviour is not to do anything
IPv6 and NATs.
It would be sad if the IETF did not learn from past mistakes.