[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [BEHAVE] IPv6 Flow Label
On 6/05/08 11:00 PM, "Simon Perreault" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 May 2008 08:52:49 Hesham Soliman wrote:
>> => I don't know why we're talking about NATs and IPv6. It sounds like a
>> flawed assumption from the beginning.
> I thought the use case for TURNv6 was to allow interoperability between
> v4-only and v6-only devices, but now I'm not so sure we're all on the same
=> Well, in that case the flow label is a moot point. Also, there are
requirements and solutions being worked on in v6ops to do this using NAT-PT.