[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 6to4 anycast IP as source address / PTR record

To: Kevin Day <toasty@dragondata.com>
Subject: Re: 6to4 anycast IP as source address / PTR record
From: Antonio Querubin <tony@lava.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 16:41:19 -1000 (HST)
Cc: v6ops <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <9F195FE7-E47F-4CC3-B93E-5FA4AAF1088A@dragondata.com>
References: <9F195FE7-E47F-4CC3-B93E-5FA4AAF1088A@dragondata.com>

On Wed, 30 Jan 2008, Kevin Day wrote:

relay should use when encapsulating packets? Additionally, is anyone stronglyfor or against adding a PTR record for 192.88.99.1 that might help documentits use better?

A PTR record should probably be added but it's not a show-stopper. Doinga whois for 192.88.99.0 or googling 192.88.99.1 should provide anyonecurious enough with more info than a PTR RR would.

References:
- 6to4 anycast IP as source address / PTR record
  - From: Kevin Day <toasty@dragondata.com>

Prev by Date: Re: 6to4 anycast IP as source address / PTR record
Next by Date: Re: 6to4 anycast IP as source address / PTR record
Previous by thread: Re: 6to4 anycast IP as source address / PTR record
Next by thread: Re: 6to4 anycast IP as source address / PTR record
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread