[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 6to4 using ::FFFF:0000:0000/96 (mail.comcast.net AAAA record weirdness)

To: Kevin Day <toasty@dragondata.com>
Subject: Re: 6to4 using ::FFFF:0000:0000/96 (mail.comcast.net AAAA record weirdness)
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 22:32:55 +0100
Cc: Rémi Després <remi.despres@free.fr>, v6ops <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <A3B8A0B7-7E54-4A88-8C07-29DD2CBE727E@dragondata.com> (Kevin Day's message of "Sun, 27 Jan 2008 14:21:21 -0600")
References: <1960684A-584F-4754-A122-0940BC61DDC0@dragondata.com> <67099930801231003l648d3200k7c86be48d35b21ef@mail.gmail.com> <479CD34E.7010403@free.fr> <A3B8A0B7-7E54-4A88-8C07-29DD2CBE727E@dragondata.com>

* Kevin Day:

> So, I think it's XP not doing the right thing here... XP should be
> selecting its own v4 stack instead of trying to shove packets  to
> ::ffff:0:0/96 down 6to4... correct?

Yes, I think this would have been the correct approach.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 6to4 using ::FFFF:0000:0000/96 (mail.comcast.net AAAA record weirdness)
  - From: Rémi Després <remi.despres@free.fr>

References:
- 6to4 using ::FFFF:0000:0000/96 (mail.comcast.net AAAA record weirdness)
  - From: Kevin Day <toasty@dragondata.com>
- Re: 6to4 using ::FFFF:0000:0000/96 (mail.comcast.net AAAA record weirdness)
  - From: "Erik Kline" <ekline@ekline.com>
- Re: 6to4 using ::FFFF:0000:0000/96 (mail.comcast.net AAAA record weirdness)
  - From: Kevin Day <toasty@dragondata.com>

Prev by Date: Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-addr-select-ps-02
Next by Date: Re: 6to4 using ::FFFF:0000:0000/96 (mail.comcast.net AAAA record weirdness)
Previous by thread: Re: 6to4 using ::FFFF:0000:0000/96 (mail.comcast.net AAAA record weirdness)
Next by thread: Re: 6to4 using ::FFFF:0000:0000/96 (mail.comcast.net AAAA record weirdness)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread