[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Translation versus tunneling document
A small comment on the subject line is that it may not be
an exclusive "either/or" for translation vs. tunneling but
rather "both/and". IMHO, translators belong at the edges
of IPv6 only-sites, but those "sites" may be deeply embedded
within dual-stacked sites. Recursively-nested sites within
sites are an attractive deployment scenario for some use
cases, and they are well-supported by ISATAP.
Thanks - Fred
> -----Original Message-----
> From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ [mailto:email@example.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2007 5:45 PM
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: Translation versus tunneling document
> I've talked with Fred after the v6ops WG meeting this
> afternoon, and I will
> work in a document comparing the applicability of existing tunneling
> protocols and a possible translation mechanism in different scenarios.
> I think this will be useful to determine if we really need
> the translation
> mechanism for all the cases or just for a small subset,
> making easier the
> development of that translation protocol.
> I will try to get this done in the next couple of weeks, at
> least a first
> draft. If some other people is interested in working on this,
> please let me
> The IPv6 Portal: http://www.ipv6tf.org
> Bye 6Bone. Hi, IPv6 !
> This electronic message contains information which may be
> privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be
> for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not
> the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or use of the contents of this information,
> including attached files, is prohibited.