[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-v6ops-nap-06.txt
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 08:38:26 -0700
"Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com> wrote:
> > Maybe I'm alone, but I would like the IESG to consider reinstating the
> > original NAP name. It's more appropriate, and is well-known
> > within the
> > IPv6 community today.
While I generally prefer NAP over LNP, I wonder if it is really
necessary to give this group of techniques a formal name. I think
giving it a formal name starts to imply a fixed set of techniques,
implying that there won't be additions to the set.
How about titling it "NAT alternatives when using IPv6" or something
similarly descriptive ?