[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [dhcwg] Review of draft-ietf-v6ops-scanning-implications
- To: "Stig Venaas" <stig.venaas@uninett.no>, <dhcwg@ietf.org>
- Subject: RE: [dhcwg] Review of draft-ietf-v6ops-scanning-implications
- From: "Bernie Volz \(volz\)" <volz@cisco.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 10:14:43 -0500
- Authentication-results: rtp-dkim-2; header.From=volz@cisco.com; dkim=pass (s ig from cisco.com/rtpdkim2001 verified; );
- Cc: <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
- Dkim-signature: v=0.5; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=1782; t=1164640484; x=1165504484; c=relaxed/simple; s=rtpdkim2001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=volz@cisco.com; z=From:=20=22Bernie=20Volz=20\(volz\)=22=20<volz@cisco.com> |Subject:=20RE=3A=20[dhcwg]=20Review=20of=20draft-ietf-v6ops-scanning-imp lications |Sender:=20 |To:=20=22Stig=20Venaas=22=20<stig.venaas@uninett.no>,=20<dhcwg@ietf.org>; bh=TyxWjXb0zwv6+q4ch1rCK97iZNyWd75jKwdQq90N6g8=; b=UCyD2etXVwtQ+Ywpze2FdEEuxKfhcYYNiuvb8yjCBipYGNY15SOiZQE0WT+B0oC6aJe3mkQo Cl9RDMgy1hVdORkwX2HH7CmMLzu8XBqGf3oV8Zx0pE+OwZCQecgh3sBw;
I fully agree with and support this text.
- Bernie
-----Original Message-----
From: Stig Venaas [mailto:stig.venaas@uninett.no]
Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2006 4:40 PM
To: dhcwg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Review of draft-ietf-v6ops-scanning-implications
Per Fred's request, please let v6ops and/or authors know if you have
any thoughts regarding this draft. In particular there is the following
section:
4.2. DHCP Service Configuration Options
The administrator should configure DHCPv6 so that the first
addresses
allocated from the pool begins much higher in the address space than
at [prefix]::1. DHCPv6 also includes an option to use Privacy
Extension [2] addresses, i.e. temporary addresses, as described in
Section 12 of the DHCPv6 [5] specification. It is desirable that
allocated addresses are not sequential, nor have any predictable
pattern to them.
Stig
Fred Baker wrote:
> The v6ops working group is approaching a working group last call on
> draft-ietf-v6ops-scanning-implications within the coming few weeks.
We
> would appreciate a review from your working group of this document
> before we do so. How that is done is up to you; you may designate one
> or more reviewers, or simply conduct the review on your mailing list,
> or whatever else suits you. But please respond to the authors copying
> v6ops within the coming four weeks if you would.
>
> Thank you for your help in this.
>
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg