[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [firstname.lastname@example.org: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: email@example.com [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] On Behalf
> Of Iljitsch van Beijnum
> Sent: Friday, April 14, 2006 11:07 AM
> To: Scott Leibrand
> Cc: Jason Schillerschiller@uu.net; Joe Abley; shim6-wg; email@example.com;
> firstname.lastname@example.org; IETF Discussion; email@example.com;
> Subject: Re: [firstname.lastname@example.org: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
> On 14-apr-2006, at 16:57, Scott Leibrand wrote:
> > 60 voted in favor of moving forward with PI. 6 voted against.
> Wow, 10 to 1. Amazing.
> Even more amazing: 60 people who represent nobody but their own
> paycheck get to blow up the internet.
> Where is ICANN when you need it? This little experiment in playground
> democracy has to end before people get hurt.
How about you start operating a real network and feel the pain of your
enterprise customers who require usability? IPv6 is a failure because of
ongoing FUD regarding so called 'routing table explosion' that even IPv4 is
still susceptible to, and all this "ipv6 will even wash your dishes!" claims
having no ROI. I was hoping for people to stop preaching to choir on FUD
and 'utopian routing policies' (see geographical, or should I say
geopolitical routing), and this move toward PI addressing in ARIN land is
definitely a great step and achievement toward success of IPv6 as an
TowardEX Technologies, Inc.
Phone: +1 617-459-4051 x179
Mobile: +1 978-394-2867
Fax: +1 432-225-3784