[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Requirements for Link Adaptation over IP-in-IPv4 Tunnels (was RE: Link Adaptation for IPv6-in-IPv4 Tunnels)
Fred - please see:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fred Baker [mailto:email@example.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 23, 2005 9:24 AM
> To: Templin, Fred L
> Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: Re: Link Adaptation for IPv6-in-IPv4 Tunnels
> Does it still propose a protocol or protocol change?
> I don't know offhand whether the charter of v6ops then precluded
> protocol work, and won't go into whether it was proper for [MECH] to
> be done in v6ops. Given the present charter, I can treat it as a
> requirements document that may be asking for something like the work
> you are proposing. But my read of the document you pointed to
> is that
> it is still proposing an incompatible change (as in "unchanged
> equipment will not perform the function and once the message is
> segmented in this fashion it must be reassembled in this fashion.
> I think that has to be done in a WG chartered to do non-backward-
> compatible changes to IPv4.
> On Sep 23, 2005, at 9:04 AM, Templin, Fred L wrote:
> > Can this work be contributed as an extension to [MECH]?