[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Discussion of draft-ietf-v6ops-ent-analysis-02.txt
Does the WG really have consensus on this recommendation?
Later in the transition process, after the enterprise has
transitioned to a predominately IPv6 infrastructure, the architect
should implement the Dual-IP Transition Mechanism [DSTM, DSTM+]. Or
in the case of early deployment of IPv6-dominant networks DSTM can
be used too.
This whole document comes down to a brief set of recommendations, and
I think that it is important that we only make recommendations that
have the clear consensus of the WG.
I am not personally convinced that we should recommend DSTM as a
solution for this stage of network transition (I haven't even read
DSTM+, so I have no opinion on that), but perhaps I am part of the
rough? Fred, was there an explicit consensus call on each of these
recommendations that I missed while I was busy somewhere else?
If the WG does have consensus that, at some point in an enterprise
transition, administrators "should implement DSTM", what is our plan
to standardize it?