[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [v6tc] Re: Tunneling and Transition Drafts
Well, on my notes I have the question Alain asked at the end that was:
"Who would be happy if TC just take TSP and make it an RFC?" You don't
mention this question that had a large majority of yes. Then I would be
happy to get the "official" minutes as well :)
Pekka Savola wrote:
On Wed, 6 Apr 2005, Jerome Durand wrote:
I am not sure I share the view that the BOF was a non-event. There was
an agreement from a *large majority* of people in the room to say that
the WG should take TSP that fulfills all requirements presented, and
make it a standard. Now I guess it's time to move on in that direction.
It will be interesting to see BoF minutes, because I didn't see large
majority. For what it's worth, my recollection was:
I saw less than about 5-10 people supporting TSP.
I saw less than about 5-10 people supporting doing something new.
I saw less than about 5-10 people being comfortable with existing
mechanisms (like L2TP).
Bottom line is that if we don't need to care about the RTT and overhead
concerns at all, I can't clearly see real benefits for TSP instead of
just using L2TP.