[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Request to Publish ISATAP
Fred Templin wrote:
Sorry for moving so quickly on this, but I submitted a -10.txt
draft before seeing your message. It can be viewed at:
This is somehow better, but there are still problems.
I hope you can fix them in -11.
2. There are no mandatory rules for the selection of a FQDN, but
administrators are encouraged to use the convention
"isatap.domainname" (e.g., isatap.example.com.)
The -10 draft says nothing on how this name is communicated
from the site Isatap administrator to the isatap nodes.
I guess the draft should say this is done by an out-of band
method,e.g. manual configuration.
If this is the case, then I would strongly recommend you add some
text to say that in the absence of configuration data,
implementations MUST NOT assume that isatap.domainame
will work, and in particular MUST provide a way for the user
to configure that parameter.