[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: ocean: do not boil
- To: "Keith Moore" <email@example.com>
- Subject: RE: ocean: do not boil
- From: "Bound, Jim" <Jim.Bound@hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 10:26:38 -0400
- Cc: "Brian E Carpenter" <firstname.lastname@example.org>,"Hesham Soliman (EAB)" <email@example.com>,"Bob Hinden" <hinden@IPRG.nokia.com>,"Margaret Wasserman" <firstname.lastname@example.org>,"Randy Bush" <email@example.com>, "Bob Fink" <firstname.lastname@example.org>,"Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino" <email@example.com>, <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Delivery-date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 07:27:01 -0700
- Envelope-to: email@example.com
- Thread-index: AcJkdUrQO9sExI07RgCREElsBsoMOQAKggVg
- Thread-topic: ocean: do not boil
I agree in context usually. What I am saying is that users in this case cannot be told to use relays. Some may listen and some may not. Those that don't will ignore it.
And I am not convinced we should be building relays in the IETF but I see your point.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Keith Moore [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 5:24 AM
> To: Bound, Jim
> Cc: Brian E Carpenter; Keith Moore; Hesham Soliman (EAB); Bob Hinden;
> Margaret Wasserman; Randy Bush; Bob Fink; Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino;
> Subject: Re: ocean: do not boil
> > If the v6ops even try to address this they are going to not be
> > listened too. Its none of the IETFs business.
> oh, that's silly. developing mechanisms to allow apps to
> cope with a mixture
> of v4 and v6 is certainly within IETF's business.
> the reason it won't be listened to is because having apps do
> their own addressing
> and routing is simply too difficult for most implementors.
> it will be easier to
> arrange for v6 everywhere (by shipping 6to4 and/or Teredo
> drivers with the app)
> than to build ad hoc networks at layer 7.