[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: WG Review: IPv6 Operations (v6ops)
Your just plain wrong. Do you think users are stupid? Do you think they even care about what we say here in the IETF work? No they do not. What they want are IPv6 solutions. And they will all want different ones.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pekka Savola [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 7:16 AM
> To: Brian E Carpenter
> Cc: Fred L. Templin; email@example.com
> Subject: Re: WG Review: IPv6 Operations (v6ops)
> On Wed, 4 Sep 2002, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> > "Fred L. Templin" wrote:
> > ...
> > > Summary - the wording in sections (1) and (7) seems to mandate
> > > lowest-common-denominator solutions and ignore solutions that
> > > provide a better fit.
> > It's hard to avoid special pleading (since the transition solution
> > with my name on it is in the list), but I do think that
> there is a strong
> > argument for concentrating on LCD solutions for the first wave.
> > We might contemplate a separate IETF activity for advanced
> > solutions.
> I agree with Brian.
> People already have problems trying to choose which cars to
> buy. Guides
> and expert knowledge help a bit but it's still difficult.
> It's quite much
> simpler if you don't have all that many choices to make.
> People don't get
> stuck on details, and we can concentrate better on really
> pressing matters
> (if any).
> Pekka Savola "Tell me of difficulties surmounted,
> Netcore Oy not those you stumble over and fall"
> Systems. Networks. Security. -- Robert Jordan: A Crown of Swords