[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: proposed revisions of design team document
- To: tewg-dt@ops.ietf.org
- Subject: RE: proposed revisions of design team document
- From: "Lai, Wai S (Waisum), ALSVC" <wlai@att.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 10:40:04 -0400
Jim and all,
Here's the merged version.
Thanks, Wai Sum.
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Boyle [mailto:jimpb@nc.rr.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 8:15 PM
To: Lai, Wai S (Waisum), ALSVC
Subject: Re: proposed revisions of design team document
great, these look to be definitions, I'm assuming that's what the second
section is as well. Can you incorporate into the definitions section of
my version of the draft, accept the changes (or comment to the list),
and send out another "base" version?
thanks,
Jim
Lai, Wai S (Waisum), ALSVC wrote:
> Jim,
> Thanks for revising the initial draft. It certainly is
> very well organized and has clear goals.
> Since the last conference call, I have been working on cleaning
> up the definitions section, as was discussed during the call.
> Rather than adding to the file you sent, which is already
> diffmarked, I have put it in a new file attached herewith.
> Review and comment by team members are welcome.
> Thanks, Wai Sum.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Boyle [mailto:jimpb@nc.rr.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 1:59 PM
> To: tewg-dt@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: proposed revisions of design team document
>
>
> Attached is a proposed revision of WaiSum's document.
>
> Revisions include providing some outlined structure with a goal of
> leaving the reader with a clear set of requirements as proposed by this
> design team. Please review and comment to the list. I'd like to
> discuss on tommorow's call using this revision as the base of our
> deliverable, with a goal of cleaning it up for submission next week to
> conclude this group.
> Changes were tracked, so you can highlight changes.
>
> There is still much revision required, especially in the definitions
> section. I can also clean this up into a text-only document next week.
>
> regards,
>
> Jim
>
> Multilayer survivability.doc
>
> Content-Type:
>
> application/msword
> Content-Encoding:
>
> base64
Multilayer survivability.doc