[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: could we agree on this ? Fwd: RE: TE Requirements Draft-ELSP




Sorry, I guess I wasn't explicit enough.

Yes, (iiib) should not be specifically added until someone expresses
an interest in it. 


Best,
Nabil Seddigh

 
> We understand you're after (iiia). My question was about (iiib). I think
> your words above implyi you're agreeing with the proposal for (iiib), but
> can you be explicit about it. Let me repeat the question:
> "So again, leaving aside (iiia) for now, can you agree that (iiib) should
> not specifically be added to REQTS draft for now until SPs have expressed
> the requirement for it?"
> 
> thanks
> 
> Francois
> 
> >Best,
> >Nabil