[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: The new DS-TE(01) draft --An interesting approach to TE
At 02:21 PM 11/28/2001 -0500, Iren, Sami wrote:
>I have a question on the draft. last line s of page 6 and
>first line of page 7 says:
> "The optional per-CT Local overbooking Multiplier are referred to as:
> where i identifies the CT and where 0 <= i <= 3."
>Is "3" a typo here? Shouldn't it be 7 instead, assuming the
>draft supports up to 8 CTs?
Yes it is a typo. it should be 7. I missed this one when updating the whole
document for support of up to 8 CTs.
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Kireeti Kompella [mailto:email@example.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 1:28 PM
> > To: Sanjaya.Choudhury@marconi.com; firstname.lastname@example.org
> > Subject: Re: The new DS-TE(01) draft --An interesting approach to TE
> > > Another interesting point is that this draft has really
> > nothing to do
> > > with (i.e. independent of) DiffServ !!
> > That's a feature, not a bug :-)
> > Kireeti.