[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: draft-ietf-tewg-restore-hierarchy-00.txt -> CCAMP OCT-12
> Note that this draft has some changes, in particular. the hierarchy
> requirements have been pulled back a bit.
> (1) extremely large number of LSPs within flat IGPs
> (2) ability to signal LSPs across IGP hierarchy (e.g. OSPF areas)
> (1) has been dropped, (2) is still there.
> Other portions of the document have been cleaned up, and the editors are
> encouraged to highlight the differences between the draft to the list.
> On October 12th, Ed and I intend to notify CCAMP that the requirements for
> restoration and hierarchy from the TEWG are complete. Going once .....
With the risk of sounding like a bitter whiner, do I
mis-read the draft (and the group) or it is a 24 pages long equivalent
for "We're pretty happy with what there is, just give us standardized
inter-area signaling " ?