Re: DiffServ-TE drafts : What's next ?

[Jim Boyle <jimpb@nc.rr.com>]

The order of events is (1) agree on requirements and (2) agree on
technical proposal to push forward.  (1) is almost done, except some
issues with the use of the term "Class Types" throughout the draft.
Another minor revision of the requirements document should clear that up,
and is expected shortly (next week).

As I recall, there were quite a few people in the meeting interested in
this topic who haven't read the requirements draft, right now might be a
good time to make comments if you haven't already (some have).

regards,

Jim




On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Choudhury, Sanjaya wrote:

>
> 	Hi! As we know, now there are four competitive drafts related
> DiffServ-TE
> 	(lefaucheur,boyel,kompella,ash,bitar).Discussion on these
> 	 drafts has died down, without clear consensus.
>
> 	Since these drafts has substantial effect on the interoperability, I
> was
> 	wondering, whether the WG chair has any plans on guiding the WG in
> 	this matter (e.g. like requesting the authors to come up with a
> possible
> 	compromised approach) ?
>
>
> 	Thanks,
> 	sanjay
>
>
>
>
>