namespace collision

[David Harrington <dbh@enterasys.com>]

Hi,

We have a namespace collision.

Can we please differentiate the output of this working group, called
SMIng, from the proposal that has been accepted as our starting point,
also called SMIng? Can we change one of them, or require that the
proposal always be called the "SMIng proposal"? Can we simply call the
output SMIv3, since the previous versions of the SMI standard are called
SMIv1 and SMIv2 and it would make sense to call the next version SMIv3?

"new means that the issue is considered a new feature which is not
required in SMIng" - does that mean it is not required as part of the
output of this WG or is not required by the current proposal?  

Thanks,
dbh
-- 
---
David Harrington            Network Management Standards Architect
dbh@enterasys.com           Office of the CTO
+1 603 337 2614 - voice     Enterasys Networks
+1 603 332 1524 - fax       Rochester NH, USA