RE: IPR Notice

["Bound, Jim" <Jim.Bound@hp.com>]

Makes it even more scary to implement IMHO as product.
/jim 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-shim6@psg.com [mailto:owner-shim6@psg.com] On 
> Behalf Of Jari Arkko
> Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 4:34 AM
> To: tom.petch
> Cc: Geoff Huston; shim6@psg.com
> Subject: Re: IPR Notice
> 
> 
> >> How does this affect the Ericsson claim last April which, as I 
> >> recall, said that Ericsson would not assert its rights 
> unless anyone 
> >> claimed against Ericsson.
> >> Does this claim constitute such a claim against Ericsson?
> >>
> I am not a lawyer either, but I believe that is something 
> that affects only those two companies, i.e. Microsoft and 
> Ericsson. FWIW, my understanding is that this does not change 
> Ericsson's thinking or implementation plans.
> 
> For everyone else, nothing changed except that there is now a 
> second IPR declaration. The relevant information in the new 
> IPR declaration is Microsoft's conditions, i.e., no royalty 
> etc. Personally, those conditions look fine to me.
> 
> --Jari
> 
> 
>