[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IPsec !?, was: Re: CGA Use with HBA in Shim6 IETF Meeting July 10, 2006
In your previous mail you wrote:
so, saying that IPSec provides much more benefits than HBA/CGA but that
=> IPsec (cf RFC 4301 introduction).
cannot be used because they rely in an infrastructure that is
impossiible to deploy in a reasonable time frame is as good than to say
that IPSec is not a viable alternative, which imho should be the
conclusion from this exchange, would you agree with that?
=> I agree if you add the word "general" in front of "alternative".
To make the use of IPsec impossible as a limited alternative is more
arguable. To make shim6 and IPsec compatible is a third topics, the
question was opened by Jim and is not yet closed.