Re: shim header in every shimmed packet

[Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>]

On 12-okt-2005, at 16:35, marcelo bagnulo braun wrote:

> My question is: do you want that those additional mechanisms are  
> included in the base shim spec (not the bit that signals that the  
> shim header is needed or not, the actual mechanisms) or it is good  
> enough for you that those can be specified in a different document?

I prefer to have the mechanisms required to be able to safely enable  
suppression of the shim header in a different document.