[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Flow label versus Extension header - protocol itself
Er, with my flow label hat on, I don't think that is OK
at all. Shim6 has no particular right to take over the
Flow Label, any more than 6LSA does.
Francis Dupont wrote:
The point I'd like to make (and about which we should agree) is that
it is hard or impossible to keep full/real RFC 3697 compliance and
shim6 goal support, so if we decide to follow the flow label way the
best is to obsolete the RFC 3697 and to reserve the 20 bit field
currently named flow label to shim6 usage.