[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: proposed text for charter
I agree ....
> -----Original Message-----
> From: email@example.com [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] On
> Behalf Of Thierry Ernst
> Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2005 11:01 PM
> To: shim6
> Subject: Re: proposed text for charter
> About the following item in the charter:
> o The solution must not cause problems for mobility. That is, it
> should be possible to continue using Mobile IPv6 even when using
> shim6 simultaneously. However, any optimizations or advanced
> configurations are out of scope for shim6.
> I would suggest to write "should be possile to continue using mobility
> support protocols such as Mobile IPv6 land NEMO Basic Support"
> An additional item such as the following one would be useful:
> - The WG will ensure that various mechanisms defined within other IETF
> WGs will continue to work when using shmi6 simultaneously. To achieve
> this, the Shim6 WG will interact with other WGs when needed, and may
> place requirements on the protocols developed by those WGs.