[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RRG] loc/id split and LISP
A new architecture with a new namespace could mean that we have to
most of components of current Internet. It is a revolution rather
For example, HIP, it requests ALL end devices change their stacks, ALL
applications to be modified in order to support HIT, and to deploy
mapping real-time system in order to translate the identifier (HIT)
locator (IP). I am sure that I do not mention all the costs.
am pessimistic the abovementioned can happen in a short future. HIP
improve the network routing however. HIP++, Node ID even requests
order to optimize network routing. It consequently requests the
on all the routers besides all the abovementioned requirements. Is it
How is this cost any higher than that of deploying IPv6? It seems to
me that there's no significant qualitative cost differentiation
between deploying v6 as it stands today and some better solution. In
fact, a better solution might well be easier to deploy, as the cost/
benefit ratio might be tolerable.
to unsubscribe send a message to email@example.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg