[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [RRG] loc/id split and LISP
> From: Sheng Jiang <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> It should be what benefit LISP can bring us.
I agree. Nothing will succeed unless it brings an economic benefit.
> Of course, LISP could introduce another namespace in order to be a real
> identifier/locator split solution ... but that would be too expensive
> to be deployed.
Why do you feel that way? Is it because it would increase the cost of
deployment if we couldn't re-use IPv4 routers inside the LISP 'core', if we
designed a new namespace?
to unsubscribe send a message to email@example.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg