[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RRG] 2 RRG drafts
Is it ok if we list that as a quote, attributed to you?
On 30 okt 2005, at 16.34, Yakov Rekhter wrote:
Two IRTF RRG drafts that will be addressed in the upcoming meeting.
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
Title : Analysis of IDR requirements and History
Author(s) : A. Doria, E. Davies
Filename : draft-irtf-routing-history-02.txt
Pages : 43
Date : 2005-10-26
This document analyses the current state of IDR routing with respect
to RFC1026 and other IDR requirements and design efforts. It
companion document to "Requirements for Inter-Domain Routing"
[I-D.irtf-routing-reqs], which is a discussion of requirements
the future routing architecture and future routing protocols.
A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
This document still continues to insist that rfc1126 "outlined a set
of requirements that were to guide the development of BGP". As we
disccused before (see e-mail exchange aroung Aug 2004), this is
incorrect. To correctly reflect the history please replace the
current text with the following:
While some people expected a set of requirements outlined in
to guide the development of BGP, in reality the development of BGP
happened completely independently of RFC1126. In other words, from
the point of view of the development of BGP, RFC1126 turned out
to unsubscribe send a message to firstname.lastname@example.org with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg