Weber [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] writes:
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 6:10 AM, Glen Zorn <email@example.com> wrote:
Hannes Tschofenig <mailto://
> why is there is a working group last call on this document given that
> still has an open issue section giving me the impression that the
> document is far from being ready?
1) As you know, the issues list is not an official WG
document, but a tool
for the use of the Chairs & as such its state has no bearing on the status
of a document.
2) All 3 of the issues assigned to the extended attributes document appear
to actually refer to RFC 5080.
I suspect Hannes was referring to the open issues section in
the draft's text,
not the list maintained by the chairs. Regarding the
latter, the issue that I
filed (#250) was intended for your -00 draft, not RFC 5080.
Be that as it may, the link points to an issue raised by Bernard
re: the Fixes draft.
I haven't read
your current draft version yet to see if these comments were
there was no response on the list -that I recall.
Probably not, since it was an individual submission & last
time I checked the authors of such have no obligation to respond to the WG,
which in turn has no control over the work.