[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Guidelines suggested text for checklist:
Bernard Aboba writes...
> I think that the issue is that there is no inherent interoperability
> benefit from rehosting VSAs that already conform to the criteria
> expressed in the document into the RADIUS standard attribute space.
Agreed. The section I commented upon seems to address new designs. I
wasn't thinking about re-hosting.
> As long as a VSA conforms to the checklist, it can be added to
> existing RADIUS servers, so that there is no reason for the IETF to
> force the SDO to use the RADIUS standard space solely in order to
> get the document reviewed.
Sure, but that still doesn't tell me as a reader of this guideline when to
use a VSA allocation and when to use an IANA allocation. Do I use an IANA
allocation only when publishing my new attribute via the IETF?
to unsubscribe send a message to email@example.com with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.