[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: RFC3576bis and Session State
David B. Nelson <> allegedly scribbled on Saturday, May 26, 2007 8:22
> Alan DeKok writes...
>>> Since both the RADIUS server and client have to change to support
>>> your suggestion, it would be really cool if we could actually
>>> _solve_ that problem here instead of just applying YABA, don't you
>> My suggestion is only relevant to new implementations of CoA, in
>> which case they're changing anyways...
> Yes, but I think Glen is fishing for support for his "logoff" draft,
> in which he introduces a new RADIUS command types, that allow the NAS
> to explicitly signal the
beginning and the
> end of a session to the RADIUS Server. One
> problem with that draft is that the RADEXT WG charter disallows the
> introduction of new commands.
Ah, so! Are you _sure_? Are you positive that 10 minutes after we
submit it to the RFC Editor as an individual submission it won't
magically become in conflict w/this WG's charter?
to unsubscribe send a message to firstname.lastname@example.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.