[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New Technical Issues RE: WG last call in progress on VLAN/Priority Draft
Emile van Bergen <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> I find it incomprehensible that the DIAMETER format would not need any
> evaluation against the alternatives on the merits, but that people can
> just wave their hands and say, there's already some diameter parsing
> code in many RADIUS server's that support TTLS in some form or other, so
> hey, 'tis the only sensible road ahead.
s/only/proven working, implemented, deployed, and functional/
If there are other alternatives, they should be explored, of course.
But the diameter format, while wasteful of space in the RADIUS packet,
*is* a proven one.
to unsubscribe send a message to email@example.com with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.