[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: radius dynauth client/server mibs structure
I am happy to chekc a pre-release rev 04 as well.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nelson, David [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 21:24
> To: email@example.com
> Cc: Nagi Reddy Jonnala (njonnala); firstname.lastname@example.org;
> email@example.com; Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
> Subject: RE: radius dynauth client/server mibs structure
> Stefaan DeCnodder writes...
> > Since the suggestion has sufficient support it is best to
> do so. Is it
> > Ok to sent a version -04 of both docs after the IETF containing all
> > updates?
> That would be best. You can submit -04 any time that it is ready (all
> the changes are incorporated). It won't be published until after
> IETF-65. I-D submissions are now queued for publication, as
> opposed to
> bounced, during the IETF meeting "blackout" periods.
> While you are at it, though, all the other nits in the -03 drafts that
> could have been addressed with RFC Editor notes should be
> to keep the process as simple as possible.
> It would also be appropriate to send the "diff" text to the RADEXT WG
> list before submitting tie -04 drafts, so that the WG gets to look at
> the proposed issue resolutions in detail. We have discussed
> them on the
> list, so I think folks are generally aware, but posting the exact text
> would be helpful.
> -- Dave
to unsubscribe send a message to firstname.lastname@example.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.