Re: RADEXT Issue 148 Item 6

["Alan DeKok" <aland@ox.org>]

"Nelson, David" <dnelson@enterasys.com> wrote:
> (1) Should the existing RADIUS MIB objects that count malformed packets
> be deprecated, a normative definition of malformed created, and new
> counter objects be added to count malformed packets according to the new
> definition?  {YES|NO}

  No.

> (2) Should the normative definition of malformed packets, created as
> described in Question (1), include packets that do not conform to the
> suggested VSA syntax of RFC 2865? {YES|NO}

  No.

  We should recommend, however, that future implementations do NOT
count non-conforming VSA's in the "malformed" count.

  Alan DeKok.

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>