RE: Discussion of RADEXT Issue 148 (MIB review)

["Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\)" <dromasca@avaya.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nelson, David [mailto:dnelson@enterasys.com] 
> Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2005 12:59 AM
> To: radiusext@ops.ietf.org
> Cc: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
> Subject: Discussion of RADEXT Issue 148 (MIB review)
> 
> 
> It would indeed be helpful to add UNITS clauses to the 
> Counter32 objects.  I can take a stab at doing this, but 
> review will be required to ensure that objects are not being 
> effectively redefined by these additions.
> 
> It would also be useful to add REFERENCE clauses to objects 
> that are specifically tied to sections of the base RFCs.  I 
> can also take a stab at that.
> 


I believe that adding UNITS and REFERENCE clauses does not change the
SYNTAX of the objects, and does not create any interoperability
problems, thus it may be considered as editorial changes for the purpose
of clarification. Actually in many cases this information is already
present in the DESCRIPTION clauses. 

Regards,

Dan


--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>